Rabasa and Federalism

Authors

Keywords:

federalism, executive, judicial review, federal intervention

Abstract

This essay analyses the constitutional thought of Emilio Rabasa in relation to federalism. Although Rabasa is known for having been a critic of the 1857 constitution and its unicameral federalism, this paper casts Rabasa as a defender of a kind of federalism that was favorable to the sovereignty of the states, as opposed to the power of the central government. Rabasa supported this argument in two ways: on the one hand the states should be reorganized to achieve the ideal of “executive governments” and on the other the excessive powers of intervention of the three branches of the federal government over the states had to be curtailed. These two dynamics impeded or hindered, according to Rabasa, the necessary political learning that gave life to federalism.

Author Biography

  • Jose Antonio Aguilar Rivera, Cide/DEP

    José Antonio Aguilar Rivera es profesor-investigador de la División de Estudios Políticos del CIDE.

Downloads

Published

2024-09-13

Issue

Section

Essay
Metrics
Views/Downloads
  • Abstract
    2225
  • pdf
    500
Further information

How to Cite

Most read articles by the same author(s)