Statistical Analysis of the Presidential Election in 2006: Fraud or Random Errors?

Authors

  • Javier Aparicio

Keywords:

election forensics, fraud

Abstract

This paper tests some of the main fraud allegations of the 2006 presidential election in Mexico with the evidence from a statistical analysis of precinct-level data. First, I ana­l­yze the data flow from the quick count, the preliminary results (prep) and the official district tally (cómputo distrital). Secondly, I analyze the size and distribution of errors in the polling-station acts and the partial recount. Lastly, I consider atypical precincts and the ro­le of party representatives. My main conclusion is that, since most fraud allegations are not supported by the evidence, the presidential election outcome is statistically reliable.

Downloads

Issue

Section

Articles
Metrics
Views/Downloads
  • Abstract
    851
  • PDF
    1486
Further information

How to Cite

Aparicio, J. (2015). Statistical Analysis of the Presidential Election in 2006: Fraud or Random Errors? Política Y Gobierno, 16(2b). http://www.politicaygobierno.cide.edu/index.php/pyg/article/view/202