¿Utopía o realidad? Uniones monetarias en Sudamérica. Un enfoque económico y político
Palabras clave:
Latinoamérica, integración monetaria, vectores autorregresivos, integración regional, integración política
Resumen
Esta investigación evalúa la posibilidad de una integración monetaria en Sudamérica, incorporando un enfoque económico y político. De acuerdo con el enfoque económico, los países pertenecientes a la Comunidad Andina (CAN) están mejor posicionados para adoptar una moneda común en comparación con los países del Mercosur. En el enfoque político, la principal conclusión es que no existen las condiciones políticas adecuadas que viabilicen un proceso de integración monetaria en Sudamérica. Las limitantes políticas son: la ausencia de un líder regional a nivel político y económico, el exceso de proyectos de integración, la dependencia de coincidencias ideológicas para profundizar los procesos de integración, la renuencia a la pérdida de soberanía por parte de los Estados y la falta de supranacionalidad. Por lo tanto, es poco probable que en el corto o mediano plazo se lleve a cabo una integración monetaria en Sudamérica.
Citas
Alesina, Alberto, Robert Barro, and Silvana Tenreyro. 2002. “Optimal Currency Areas.” National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper Series No. 9072.
Baldwin, Richard E., and Charles Wyplosz. 2012. The Economics of European Integration. 4. ed. London: McGraw-Hill higher education.
Barros, P. S., and J. S. B. Gonçalves. 2021. “Crisis in South American Regionalism and Brazilian Protagonism in Unasur, the Lima Group and Prosur.” Revista Brasileira de Politica Internacional 64(2).
Barros, Pedro, Julia de Souza Borba Gonçalves, and Sofía Samurio. 2020. “Desintegração Econômica e Fragmentação Da Governança Regional Na América Do Sul Em Tempos de Covid-19.”
Basnet, Hem C., and Gyan Pradhan. 2017. “Regional Economic Integration in Mercosur: The Role of Real and Financial Sectors.” Review of Development Finance 7(2):107–19.
Bayoumi, T., and B. Eichengreen. 1994. One Money or Many? Analysing the Prospects for Monetary Unification in Various Parts of the World. International Economics Section, Departement of Economics Princeton University,.
Bianculli, Andrea C. 2016. “154Latin America” edited by T. A. Börzel and T. Risse. The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Regionalism 0.
Bianculli, Andrea C. 2020. “Politicization and Regional Integration in Latin America: Implications for EU–MERCOSUR Negotiations?” Politics and Governance 8(1):254–65.
Blanchard, Olivier Jean, and Danny Quah. 1989. “The Dynamic Effects of Aggregate Demand and Supply Disturbances.” The American Economic Review 79(4):655–73.
Bresser-Pereira, Luiz Carlos, and Marcio Holland. 2009. “Common Currency and Economic Integration in Mercosul.” Journal of Post Keynesian Economics 32(2):213–34.
Caballero, Sergio, and Diego Crescentino. 2020. “From the Quest for Autonomy to the Dual Break: Structural and Agential Changes in Brazil’s Foreign Policy during the 21st Century.” Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional 63:20.
Camino Apunte, Juan. 2014. “El Papel de La Ideología En La Política Exterior de Integración Regional En América Del Sur, Casos de Argentina, Brasil, Colombia, Venezuela y Ecuador.” Universidad de Salamanca.
Coelho, Diogo Ramos. 2020. “Brazil’s Economic Reform Roads.” Business Economics 55(2):80–91.
Comini, Nicolás Matías, and Alejandro Frenkel. 2020. “UNASUR on the Edge.” P. 268 in Regionalism Under Stress: Europe and Latin America in Comparative Perspective, edited by B. Nolte, Detlef; Weiffen. London: Routledge.
Crum, Ben. 2013. “Saving the Euro at the Cost of Democracy?” Journal of Common Market Studies 51(4):614–30.
Cusack, Asa K. 2019. “The Unified Regional Compensation System (SUCRE) BT - Venezuela, ALBA, and the Limits of Postneoliberal Regionalism in Latin America and the Caribbean.” Pp. 119–52 in, edited by A. K. Cusack. New York: Palgrave Macmillan US.
Deutschmann, Emanuel, and Lara Minkus. 2018. “Swinging Leftward: Public Opinion on Economic and Political Integration in Latin America, 1997–2010.” Latin American Research Review 53(1):38–56.
Dincer, Nergiz, and Barry Eichengreen. 2014. “Central Bank Transparency and Independence: Updates and New Measures.” International Journal of Central Banking 10:189–253.
Dubé, Sébastien, and Tatiana Zuluaga Orozco. 2019. “El Impacto de La Instrumentalización de Organizaciones Latinoamericanas En La Integración: Tres Ilustraciones Desde Chile.” América Latina Hoy 82:43–62.
Edwards, Sebastian. 2006. “Monetary Unions, External Shocks and Economic Performance: A Latin American Perspective.” International Economics and Economic Policy 3(3–4):225–47.
Eichengreen, Barry. 1998. “Does Mercosur Need a Single Currency.” National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper Series No. 6821.
Eichengreen, Barry. 2012. “European Monetary Integration with Benefit of Hindsight.” Journal of Common Market Studies 50(SUPPL.1):123–36.
Fermandois, Joaquín. 2011a. “Pragmatism, Ideology, and Tradition in Chilean Foreign Policy since 1990.” in Latin American Foreign Policies: Between Ideology and Pragmatism.
Fermandois, Joaquín. 2011b. “Pragmatism, Ideology, and Tradition in Chilean Foreign Policy Since 1990 BT - Latin American Foreign Policies: Between Ideology and Pragmatism.” Pp. 35–52 in, edited by G. L. Gardini and P. Lambert. New York: Palgrave Macmillan US.
Frankel, J., and A. Rose. 1997. “Is EMU More Justifiable Ex Post than Ex Ante?” European Economic Review 41:753-760.
De Grauwe, Paul. 2016. Economics of Monetary Union. 11th ed. Oxford University Press.
De Grauwe, Paul, and Yuemei Ji. 2015. “Has the Eurozone Become Less Fragile? Some Empirical Tests.” Journal of Policy Modeling 37(3):404–14.
Haas, Ernst B., and Philippe C. Schmitter. 1964. “Economics and Differential Patterns of Political Integration: Projections About Unity in Latin America.” International Organization 18(4):705–37.
Hadjimichalis, Costis. 2011. “Uneven Geographical Development and Socio-Spatial Justice and Solidarity: European Regions after the 2009 Financial Crisis.” European Urban and Regional Studies 18(3):254–74.
Hafner, KA., and L. Kampe. 2018. “Monetary Union in Latin America: An Assessment in the Context of Optimum Currency Area.” Appl Econ 50:5672–5697.
Hallwood, Paul, and Ian W. Marsh. 2006. “An Assessment of the Case for Monetary Union or Official Dollarization in Five Latin American Countries.” 7:52–66.
Hiroi, T., and D. Block. 2011. Central Bank Independence in Words and in Deeds: Lessons from Brazil and Chile.
Kenen, Peter. 1969. “The Theory of Optimum Currency Areas: An Eclectic View.” Pp. 41–60 in Monetary problems of the international economy, edited by A. Mundell, R. and Swoboda. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
King, Robert, Charles Plosser, James Stock, and Mark Watson. 1987. “Stochastic Trends and Economic Fluctuations.” The American Economic Review.
Kurt A. Hafner & Lennart Kampe. 2018. “Monetary Union in Latin America: An Assessment in the Context of Optimum Currency Area.” Taylor & Francis Journals 50(52.
Larrain, Felipe, and Jose Tavares. 2003. “Regional Currencies Versus Dollarization: Options for Asia and the Americas.” Journal of Policy Reform 6:35–49.
Licandro, Gerardo. 2000. Is Mercosur an Optimal Currency Area ? A Shock Correlation Perspective A Shock Correlation Perspective. Montevideo.
Malamud, Andrés, and Gian Luca Gardini. 2012. “Has Regionalism Peaked? The Latin American Quagmire and Its Lessons.” The International Spectator 47:116–33.
McKinnon, R. 1963. “Optimum Currency Area.” American Economic Review vol.53:717–25.
Merke, Federico. 2013. “Liberalismo.” in Introducción a las Relaciones Internacionales America Latina y la Política Global, edited by A. Santa-Cruz, T. Legler, and L. Zamudio.
Minke Contreras, J. 2020. “Towards Development-Oriented Foreign Policy in Latin America: The Cases of Ecuador and Chile.” Bulletin of Latin American Research.
Mitrany, David. 1944. “A Working Peace System. An Argument for the Functional Development of International Organization.” International Affairs 20(1):109.
Moravcsik, Andrew. 1988. The Choice for Europe: Social Purpose and State Power from Messina to Maastricht. First. Routledge.
Moravcsik, Andrew, and Frank Schimmelfennig. 2018. “4. Liberal Intergovernmentalism.” Pp. 64–84 in European Integration Theory. Oxford University Press.
Mundell, Robert A. 1961. “A Theory of Optimum Currency Areas.” The American Economic ReviewAmerican Economic Review 51(4):657–65.
Mundell, Robert A. 1973. “Uncommon Arguments for Common Currencies.” Pp. 114–32 in The Economics of Common Currencies, edited by H. G. Johnson and A. K. Swoboda. London: Allen and Unwin.
Nolte, Detlef, and Víctor Mijares. 2018. “Regionalismo Posthegemónico En Crisis.¿Por Qué La Unasur Se Desintegra? Foreign Affairs Latinoamérica.” 18:105–12.
Numa, Moises. 2011. “The Feasibility of a Monetary Union in MERCOSUR.” Michigan Journal of Business 4(2):11–59.
Nye, J. S. 1965. “Patterns and Catalysts in Regional Integration.” International Organization 19(4):870–84.
Obstfeld, M., and K. Rogoff. 1996. Foundations of International Macroeconomics. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Padilla, León, and Eduardo Marín. 2022. “Monetary Integration in South America: Election of Candidates Through Unsupervised Machine Learning.” Revista de Economía Mundial (61):63–89.
Padilla, León, and Ángel Rodriguez García-Brazales. 2021. “Can South America Form an Optimal Monetary Area? A Structural Vector Autoregression Analysis.” International Economics and Economic Policy 18(2):309–29.
Pérez Caldentey, Esteban, Daniel Titelman Kardonsky, and Georgina Cipoletta Tomassian. 2013. “Sistema de Pagos Transnacionales Vigentes En América Latina : ALADI, SML y SUCRE.”
Pérez Caldentey, Esteban, and Matías Vernengo. 2020. “The Historical Evolution of Monetary Policy in Latin America.” Pp. 953–80 in Handbook of the History of Money and Currency, edited by S. Battilossi, Y. Cassis, and K. Yago. Singapore: Springer Singapore.
Porras Gómez, Antonio-Martín. 2014. “La Dimensión Constitucional Del Poder Presupuestario de La Unión Europea.” Estudios de Deusto 62(1 SE-Estudios):191–212.
del Río Villar, Susana, and María Luisa Sánchez Barrueco. 2012. “Responsabilización Institucional y Comunicación En La Unión Europea.” Cuadernos Europeos de Deusto (46 SE-Estudios):113–46.
Rivarola Puntigliano, Andres, and Jose Briceño Ruiz. 2017. Brazil and Latin America: Between the Separation and Integration Paths.
Rodolfo Dall’Orto Mas, Benjamin Vonessen, Christian Fehlker, and Katrin Arnold. 2020. The Case for Central Bank Independence: A Review of Key Issues in the International Debate.
Saraiva, Miriam. 2020. “The Democratic Regime and the Changes in Brazilian Foreign Policy towards South America.” Brazilian Political Science Review 14.
Scholvin, Sören, and Andrés Malamud. 2020. “Is Brazil a Geoeconomic Node? Geography, Public Policy, and the Failure of Economic Integration in South America.” Brazilian Political Science Review (Online) 14.
Vaz, Alcides, Alexandre Fuccille, and Lucas Rezende. 2018. “UNASUR, Brazil, and the South American Defence Cooperation: A Decade Later.” Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional 60.
Venter, Zoë. 2020. “The Interaction Between Conventional Monetary Policy and Financial Stability: Chile, Colombia, Japan, Portugal and the UK.” Comparative Economic Studies 62(3):521–54.
Visser, Hans. 2004. A Guide To International Monetary Economics.Exchange Rate Theories, Systems and Policies. Third Edit. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Wehner, Leslie E. 2020. “Chile’s Soft Misplaced Regional Identity.” Cambridge Review of International Affairs.
Baldwin, Richard E., and Charles Wyplosz. 2012. The Economics of European Integration. 4. ed. London: McGraw-Hill higher education.
Barros, P. S., and J. S. B. Gonçalves. 2021. “Crisis in South American Regionalism and Brazilian Protagonism in Unasur, the Lima Group and Prosur.” Revista Brasileira de Politica Internacional 64(2).
Barros, Pedro, Julia de Souza Borba Gonçalves, and Sofía Samurio. 2020. “Desintegração Econômica e Fragmentação Da Governança Regional Na América Do Sul Em Tempos de Covid-19.”
Basnet, Hem C., and Gyan Pradhan. 2017. “Regional Economic Integration in Mercosur: The Role of Real and Financial Sectors.” Review of Development Finance 7(2):107–19.
Bayoumi, T., and B. Eichengreen. 1994. One Money or Many? Analysing the Prospects for Monetary Unification in Various Parts of the World. International Economics Section, Departement of Economics Princeton University,.
Bianculli, Andrea C. 2016. “154Latin America” edited by T. A. Börzel and T. Risse. The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Regionalism 0.
Bianculli, Andrea C. 2020. “Politicization and Regional Integration in Latin America: Implications for EU–MERCOSUR Negotiations?” Politics and Governance 8(1):254–65.
Blanchard, Olivier Jean, and Danny Quah. 1989. “The Dynamic Effects of Aggregate Demand and Supply Disturbances.” The American Economic Review 79(4):655–73.
Bresser-Pereira, Luiz Carlos, and Marcio Holland. 2009. “Common Currency and Economic Integration in Mercosul.” Journal of Post Keynesian Economics 32(2):213–34.
Caballero, Sergio, and Diego Crescentino. 2020. “From the Quest for Autonomy to the Dual Break: Structural and Agential Changes in Brazil’s Foreign Policy during the 21st Century.” Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional 63:20.
Camino Apunte, Juan. 2014. “El Papel de La Ideología En La Política Exterior de Integración Regional En América Del Sur, Casos de Argentina, Brasil, Colombia, Venezuela y Ecuador.” Universidad de Salamanca.
Coelho, Diogo Ramos. 2020. “Brazil’s Economic Reform Roads.” Business Economics 55(2):80–91.
Comini, Nicolás Matías, and Alejandro Frenkel. 2020. “UNASUR on the Edge.” P. 268 in Regionalism Under Stress: Europe and Latin America in Comparative Perspective, edited by B. Nolte, Detlef; Weiffen. London: Routledge.
Crum, Ben. 2013. “Saving the Euro at the Cost of Democracy?” Journal of Common Market Studies 51(4):614–30.
Cusack, Asa K. 2019. “The Unified Regional Compensation System (SUCRE) BT - Venezuela, ALBA, and the Limits of Postneoliberal Regionalism in Latin America and the Caribbean.” Pp. 119–52 in, edited by A. K. Cusack. New York: Palgrave Macmillan US.
Deutschmann, Emanuel, and Lara Minkus. 2018. “Swinging Leftward: Public Opinion on Economic and Political Integration in Latin America, 1997–2010.” Latin American Research Review 53(1):38–56.
Dincer, Nergiz, and Barry Eichengreen. 2014. “Central Bank Transparency and Independence: Updates and New Measures.” International Journal of Central Banking 10:189–253.
Dubé, Sébastien, and Tatiana Zuluaga Orozco. 2019. “El Impacto de La Instrumentalización de Organizaciones Latinoamericanas En La Integración: Tres Ilustraciones Desde Chile.” América Latina Hoy 82:43–62.
Edwards, Sebastian. 2006. “Monetary Unions, External Shocks and Economic Performance: A Latin American Perspective.” International Economics and Economic Policy 3(3–4):225–47.
Eichengreen, Barry. 1998. “Does Mercosur Need a Single Currency.” National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper Series No. 6821.
Eichengreen, Barry. 2012. “European Monetary Integration with Benefit of Hindsight.” Journal of Common Market Studies 50(SUPPL.1):123–36.
Fermandois, Joaquín. 2011a. “Pragmatism, Ideology, and Tradition in Chilean Foreign Policy since 1990.” in Latin American Foreign Policies: Between Ideology and Pragmatism.
Fermandois, Joaquín. 2011b. “Pragmatism, Ideology, and Tradition in Chilean Foreign Policy Since 1990 BT - Latin American Foreign Policies: Between Ideology and Pragmatism.” Pp. 35–52 in, edited by G. L. Gardini and P. Lambert. New York: Palgrave Macmillan US.
Frankel, J., and A. Rose. 1997. “Is EMU More Justifiable Ex Post than Ex Ante?” European Economic Review 41:753-760.
De Grauwe, Paul. 2016. Economics of Monetary Union. 11th ed. Oxford University Press.
De Grauwe, Paul, and Yuemei Ji. 2015. “Has the Eurozone Become Less Fragile? Some Empirical Tests.” Journal of Policy Modeling 37(3):404–14.
Haas, Ernst B., and Philippe C. Schmitter. 1964. “Economics and Differential Patterns of Political Integration: Projections About Unity in Latin America.” International Organization 18(4):705–37.
Hadjimichalis, Costis. 2011. “Uneven Geographical Development and Socio-Spatial Justice and Solidarity: European Regions after the 2009 Financial Crisis.” European Urban and Regional Studies 18(3):254–74.
Hafner, KA., and L. Kampe. 2018. “Monetary Union in Latin America: An Assessment in the Context of Optimum Currency Area.” Appl Econ 50:5672–5697.
Hallwood, Paul, and Ian W. Marsh. 2006. “An Assessment of the Case for Monetary Union or Official Dollarization in Five Latin American Countries.” 7:52–66.
Hiroi, T., and D. Block. 2011. Central Bank Independence in Words and in Deeds: Lessons from Brazil and Chile.
Kenen, Peter. 1969. “The Theory of Optimum Currency Areas: An Eclectic View.” Pp. 41–60 in Monetary problems of the international economy, edited by A. Mundell, R. and Swoboda. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
King, Robert, Charles Plosser, James Stock, and Mark Watson. 1987. “Stochastic Trends and Economic Fluctuations.” The American Economic Review.
Kurt A. Hafner & Lennart Kampe. 2018. “Monetary Union in Latin America: An Assessment in the Context of Optimum Currency Area.” Taylor & Francis Journals 50(52.
Larrain, Felipe, and Jose Tavares. 2003. “Regional Currencies Versus Dollarization: Options for Asia and the Americas.” Journal of Policy Reform 6:35–49.
Licandro, Gerardo. 2000. Is Mercosur an Optimal Currency Area ? A Shock Correlation Perspective A Shock Correlation Perspective. Montevideo.
Malamud, Andrés, and Gian Luca Gardini. 2012. “Has Regionalism Peaked? The Latin American Quagmire and Its Lessons.” The International Spectator 47:116–33.
McKinnon, R. 1963. “Optimum Currency Area.” American Economic Review vol.53:717–25.
Merke, Federico. 2013. “Liberalismo.” in Introducción a las Relaciones Internacionales America Latina y la Política Global, edited by A. Santa-Cruz, T. Legler, and L. Zamudio.
Minke Contreras, J. 2020. “Towards Development-Oriented Foreign Policy in Latin America: The Cases of Ecuador and Chile.” Bulletin of Latin American Research.
Mitrany, David. 1944. “A Working Peace System. An Argument for the Functional Development of International Organization.” International Affairs 20(1):109.
Moravcsik, Andrew. 1988. The Choice for Europe: Social Purpose and State Power from Messina to Maastricht. First. Routledge.
Moravcsik, Andrew, and Frank Schimmelfennig. 2018. “4. Liberal Intergovernmentalism.” Pp. 64–84 in European Integration Theory. Oxford University Press.
Mundell, Robert A. 1961. “A Theory of Optimum Currency Areas.” The American Economic ReviewAmerican Economic Review 51(4):657–65.
Mundell, Robert A. 1973. “Uncommon Arguments for Common Currencies.” Pp. 114–32 in The Economics of Common Currencies, edited by H. G. Johnson and A. K. Swoboda. London: Allen and Unwin.
Nolte, Detlef, and Víctor Mijares. 2018. “Regionalismo Posthegemónico En Crisis.¿Por Qué La Unasur Se Desintegra? Foreign Affairs Latinoamérica.” 18:105–12.
Numa, Moises. 2011. “The Feasibility of a Monetary Union in MERCOSUR.” Michigan Journal of Business 4(2):11–59.
Nye, J. S. 1965. “Patterns and Catalysts in Regional Integration.” International Organization 19(4):870–84.
Obstfeld, M., and K. Rogoff. 1996. Foundations of International Macroeconomics. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Padilla, León, and Eduardo Marín. 2022. “Monetary Integration in South America: Election of Candidates Through Unsupervised Machine Learning.” Revista de Economía Mundial (61):63–89.
Padilla, León, and Ángel Rodriguez García-Brazales. 2021. “Can South America Form an Optimal Monetary Area? A Structural Vector Autoregression Analysis.” International Economics and Economic Policy 18(2):309–29.
Pérez Caldentey, Esteban, Daniel Titelman Kardonsky, and Georgina Cipoletta Tomassian. 2013. “Sistema de Pagos Transnacionales Vigentes En América Latina : ALADI, SML y SUCRE.”
Pérez Caldentey, Esteban, and Matías Vernengo. 2020. “The Historical Evolution of Monetary Policy in Latin America.” Pp. 953–80 in Handbook of the History of Money and Currency, edited by S. Battilossi, Y. Cassis, and K. Yago. Singapore: Springer Singapore.
Porras Gómez, Antonio-Martín. 2014. “La Dimensión Constitucional Del Poder Presupuestario de La Unión Europea.” Estudios de Deusto 62(1 SE-Estudios):191–212.
del Río Villar, Susana, and María Luisa Sánchez Barrueco. 2012. “Responsabilización Institucional y Comunicación En La Unión Europea.” Cuadernos Europeos de Deusto (46 SE-Estudios):113–46.
Rivarola Puntigliano, Andres, and Jose Briceño Ruiz. 2017. Brazil and Latin America: Between the Separation and Integration Paths.
Rodolfo Dall’Orto Mas, Benjamin Vonessen, Christian Fehlker, and Katrin Arnold. 2020. The Case for Central Bank Independence: A Review of Key Issues in the International Debate.
Saraiva, Miriam. 2020. “The Democratic Regime and the Changes in Brazilian Foreign Policy towards South America.” Brazilian Political Science Review 14.
Scholvin, Sören, and Andrés Malamud. 2020. “Is Brazil a Geoeconomic Node? Geography, Public Policy, and the Failure of Economic Integration in South America.” Brazilian Political Science Review (Online) 14.
Vaz, Alcides, Alexandre Fuccille, and Lucas Rezende. 2018. “UNASUR, Brazil, and the South American Defence Cooperation: A Decade Later.” Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional 60.
Venter, Zoë. 2020. “The Interaction Between Conventional Monetary Policy and Financial Stability: Chile, Colombia, Japan, Portugal and the UK.” Comparative Economic Studies 62(3):521–54.
Visser, Hans. 2004. A Guide To International Monetary Economics.Exchange Rate Theories, Systems and Policies. Third Edit. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Wehner, Leslie E. 2020. “Chile’s Soft Misplaced Regional Identity.” Cambridge Review of International Affairs.
Publicado
2025-10-29
Número
Sección
Notas de Investigación
Política de acceso abierto
Los autores/as que publiquen en esta revista aceptan las siguientes condiciones:
De acuerdo con la legislación de derechos de autor, Política y gobierno reconoce y respeta el derecho moral de los autores, así como la titularidad del derecho patrimonial, el cual será cedido a la revista para su difusión en acceso abierto. Política y gobierno no realiza cargos a los autores por enviar y procesar artículos para su publicación.
Todos los textos publicados por Política y gobierno –sin excepción– se distribuyen amparados bajo la licencia Creative Commons 4.0 Atribución-No Comercial (CC BY-NC 4.0 Internacional), que permite a terceros utilizar lo publicado siempre que mencionen la autoría del trabajo y a la primera publicación en esta revista.
Los autores/as pueden realizar otros acuerdos contractuales independientes y adicionales para la distribución no exclusiva de la versión del artículo publicado en Política y gobierno (por ejemplo incluirlo en un repositorio institucional o publicarlo en un libro) siempre que indiquen claramente que el trabajo se publicó por primera vez en Política y gobierno.
Para todo lo anterior, el o los autor(es) deben remitir el formato de Carta-Cesión de la Propiedad de los Derechos de la primera publicación debidamente requisitado y firmado por el autor(es). Este formato se puede enviar por correo electrónico en archivo pdf al correo: politicaygobierno@cide.edu (Carta-Cesión de Propiedad de Derechos de Autor).
Este obra está bajo una licencia de Creative Commons Reconocimiento-No Comercial 4.0 Internacional.
Contacto